Back to HomeBeta

ICD-10 Coding for Aortic Valve Regurgitation(I35.1, Q23.83)

Complete ICD-10-CM coding and documentation guide for Aortic Valve Regurgitation. Includes clinical validation requirements, documentation requirements, and coding pitfalls.

Also known as:

Aortic InsufficiencyAortic Regurgitation

Related ICD-10 Code Ranges

Complete code families applicable to Aortic Valve Regurgitation

I35-I38Primary Range

Nonrheumatic aortic valve disorders

This range includes codes for nonrheumatic aortic valve disorders, including aortic valve regurgitation.

Congenital malformations of aortic and mitral valves

This range includes codes for congenital conditions such as bicuspid aortic valve, which may be associated with aortic regurgitation.

Code Comparison: When to Use Each Code

Compare key differences between these codes to ensure accurate selection

CodeDescriptionWhen to UseKey Documentation
I35.1Nonrheumatic aortic (valve) insufficiencyUse when aortic regurgitation is confirmed to be nonrheumatic.
  • Echocardiogram showing ≥45 mL/beat regurgitant volume, ≥50% regurgitant fraction, or ERO ≥0.30 cm²
  • Documentation of nonrheumatic etiology such as degenerative calcification or bicuspid valve
Q23.83Congenital bicuspid aortic valveUse when aortic regurgitation is due to a congenital bicuspid aortic valve.
  • Echocardiogram or surgical report confirming bicuspid valve morphology

Clinical Decision Support

Always review the patient's clinical documentation thoroughly. When in doubt, choose the more specific code and ensure documentation supports it.

Key Information: ICD-10 code for aortic valve regurgitation

Essential facts and insights about Aortic Valve Regurgitation

The ICD-10 code for nonrheumatic aortic valve regurgitation is I35.1. Use Q23.83 for congenital bicuspid valve.

Primary ICD-10-CM Codes for aortic valve regurgitation

Nonrheumatic aortic (valve) insufficiency
Billable Code

Decision Criteria

clinical Criteria

  • Nonrheumatic etiology confirmed by echocardiogram or clinical history

documentation Criteria

  • Explicit mention of nonrheumatic causes such as degenerative calcification

Applicable To

  • Nonrheumatic aortic regurgitation

Excludes

  • Rheumatic aortic insufficiency (I06.1)

Clinical Validation Requirements

  • Echocardiogram showing ≥45 mL/beat regurgitant volume, ≥50% regurgitant fraction, or ERO ≥0.30 cm²
  • Documentation of nonrheumatic etiology such as degenerative calcification or bicuspid valve

Code-Specific Risks

  • Incorrectly coding as rheumatic when etiology is not specified

Coding Notes

  • Ensure documentation specifies nonrheumatic etiology to avoid defaulting to rheumatic coding.

Ancillary Codes

Additional codes that should be used in conjunction with the main diagnosis codes when applicable.

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve

Q23.83
Use when aortic regurgitation is associated with a congenital bicuspid aortic valve.

Differential Codes

Alternative codes to consider when ruling out similar conditions to the primary diagnosis.

Rheumatic aortic insufficiency

I06.1
Use when aortic regurgitation is explicitly documented as rheumatic.

Documentation & Coding Risks

Avoid these common documentation and coding issues when documenting Aortic Valve Regurgitation to ensure proper reimbursement, maintain compliance, and reduce audit risk. These guidelines are particularly important when using ICD-10 code I35.1.

Impact

Clinical: Inadequate treatment planning., Regulatory: Non-compliance with documentation standards., Financial: Potential loss of reimbursement due to incorrect DRG.

Mitigation Strategy

Use echocardiogram findings to document severity, Ensure all clinical notes include severity metrics

Impact

Reimbursement: Incorrect DRG assignment may affect reimbursement., Compliance: Non-compliance with coding guidelines., Data Quality: Inaccurate clinical data affecting patient records.

Mitigation Strategy

Ensure documentation specifies nonrheumatic etiology or query provider.

Impact

Lack of specific etiology documentation leading to incorrect coding.

Mitigation Strategy

Implement mandatory etiology documentation in cardiology assessments.

Documentation errors, coding pitfalls, and audit risks are interconnected aspects of medical coding and billing. Addressing all three areas helps ensure accurate coding, optimal reimbursement, and regulatory compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ICD-10 coding for Aortic Valve Regurgitation, with expert answers to help guide accurate code selection and documentation.

Documentation Templates for Aortic Valve Regurgitation

Use these documentation templates to ensure complete and accurate documentation for Aortic Valve Regurgitation. These templates include all required elements for proper coding and billing.

Nonrheumatic Aortic Regurgitation

Specialty: Cardiology

Required Elements

  • Etiology
  • Severity metrics
  • Echocardiogram findings
  • Symptoms

Example Documentation

Aortic Valve Assessment: Etiology: Degenerative, Severity: Regurgitant volume 60 mL/beat, Regurgitant fraction 55%, ERO 0.32 cm², Symptoms: Dyspnea NYHA Class II.

Examples: Poor vs. Good Documentation

Poor Documentation Example
Aortic regurgitation noted.
Good Documentation Example
Severe nonrheumatic aortic regurgitation due to degenerative calcification, regurgitant fraction 58%, ERO 0.35 cm².
Explanation
The good example provides specific etiology and quantifiable severity metrics.

Need help with ICD-10 coding for Aortic Valve Regurgitation? Ask your questions below.

Ask about any ICD-10 CM code, or paste a medical note

We build tools for
clinician happiness.

Learn More at Freed.ai
Back to HomeBeta

Built by Freed

Try Freed for free for 7 days.

Learn more