Complete ICD-10-CM coding and documentation guide for ESBL Urinary Tract Infection. Includes clinical validation requirements, documentation requirements, and coding pitfalls.
Also known as:
Complete code families applicable to ESBL Urinary Tract Infection
Urinary tract infection, site not specified
Primary range for coding urinary tract infections, including those caused by ESBL-producing organisms.
Resistance to antibiotics
Used to indicate antibiotic resistance, specifically ESBL resistance in this context.
Other bacterial agents as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere
Used to specify the bacterial organism causing the infection, such as E. coli or Klebsiella.
Compare key differences between these codes to ensure accurate selection
Code | Description | When to Use | Key Documentation |
---|---|---|---|
N39.0 | Urinary tract infection, site not specified | Use when diagnosing a urinary tract infection without specifying the site. |
|
Z16.12 | Resistance to extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) | Use as a secondary code to indicate ESBL resistance in infections. |
|
B96.20 | Unspecified Escherichia coli [E. coli] as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere | Use when E. coli is identified as the causative organism in an infection. |
|
Always review the patient's clinical documentation thoroughly. When in doubt, choose the more specific code and ensure documentation supports it.
Essential facts and insights about ESBL Urinary Tract Infection
Use as a secondary code to indicate ESBL resistance in infections.
Ensure laboratory confirmation of ESBL production is documented.
Use when E. coli is identified as the causative organism in an infection.
Ensure organism identification is documented.
Additional codes that should be used in conjunction with the main diagnosis codes when applicable.
Resistance to extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)
Z16.12Alternative codes to consider when ruling out similar conditions to the primary diagnosis.
Acute cystitis without hematuria
N30.00Avoid these common documentation and coding issues when documenting ESBL Urinary Tract Infection to ensure proper reimbursement, maintain compliance, and reduce audit risk. These guidelines are particularly important when using ICD-10 code N39.0.
Clinical: May lead to inappropriate antibiotic therapy., Regulatory: Non-compliance with documentation standards., Financial: Potential claim denials or reduced reimbursement.
Use specific terms like 'ESBL-producing' and document confirmatory tests., Educate clinicians on the importance of detailed documentation.
Reimbursement: Incorrect sequencing can lead to denied claims., Compliance: Non-compliance with ICD-10 coding guidelines., Data Quality: Inaccurate data representation of the patient's condition.
Always use Z16.12 as a secondary code following the primary infection code.
Reimbursement: Potential underpayment due to incomplete coding., Compliance: Failure to fully document the infection's etiology., Data Quality: Loss of specificity in clinical data.
Include B96.20 when E. coli is identified as the causative organism.
Failure to code ESBL resistance can lead to audit findings.
Ensure all cases of antibiotic resistance are coded with Z16.12 when applicable.
Documentation errors, coding pitfalls, and audit risks are interconnected aspects of medical coding and billing. Addressing all three areas helps ensure accurate coding, optimal reimbursement, and regulatory compliance.
Common questions about ICD-10 coding for ESBL Urinary Tract Infection, with expert answers to help guide accurate code selection and documentation.
Use these documentation templates to ensure complete and accurate documentation for ESBL Urinary Tract Infection. These templates include all required elements for proper coding and billing.
Need help with ICD-10 coding for ESBL Urinary Tract Infection? Ask your questions below.